In the end, I changed a little of my intervention; after I ask about people’s relaxing ways, I try to let people close their eyes to think about a scene that could make them feel relax. 

About the first part, there’s two helpful feedback: 

1. People have a lot of ideas about the way of rest. The reason why my previous guidance is difficult to work occasionally is mainly that everyone already has a way that suits them.
2. It is difficult for people to realise when there are many ways to rest. But in previous experiments, people didn’t like the alarm clock way, so what people lack is active motivation; this part can be more connected with the reward mechanism.

About the second part:

1. It is difficult for people to think of a scene in a short time(20s). Maybe this is still tension caused by the lack of freedom, but excessive space is also undesirable. It is important to find the middle balance.
2. When people start thinking, they can think of blankness, pure blankness, or the feeling of a roller coaster. I think this is related to the vision when the eyes are closed because the moment when the eyes are closed is such a scene.

Based on the above information, I have some new questions:

1. How to integrate the reward mechanism and interactivity more into the project so that everyone can be proactive
2. Is blankness a scene that relaxes everyone? Or is it just that the darkness in front of us makes everyone have a similar association? How to create a better visual guide?
3. Now, the concept of nature has gradually changed into a scene where people can resonate. My research before about nature has been combining branding, digitalisation and synesthesia. This is not a study of pure nature itself, but more of a study of nature’s healing effects on everyone. Is it time to discover a more accurate description?